Nowadays, it seems that software codes are ubiquitous since software powers everything around us, from laptops to cars to refrigerators. However, not all code is made equally. Different software programs, even they have the same purpose, can differ significantly in the quality of their performance. So What is the “ good” software code and how to do the softwareeffectively?
Developers shall offer many difficult answers to that question. Here are eight such features and developer input, culled from many online discussion forum about “ what makes good software code?”
1. It works
The software is meant to serve a concrete purpose. While some developers think it goes without saying, others feel it necessary to say that the first thing good code must do, simply, is work. If the code can not fulfill the demand for which it was originally designed, it can not be considered as a good product.
First, “the software code need working is that first thing. The beautiful, readable, testable code that will fail to meet the business demand is still a failure.
2. It’s easy to read
Most of developers agree that one of the most important qualities of software code is its readability. The code that is written in a way that create the easy for other programmers to understand with minimal amount of time and effort can be considered as top notch. Good naming, clear control flow and smart use of comment will help reading code much less of a chore and hence, easier to maintain, extend or reuse.
The faster people can look at it and understand it. The faster the application will help me forward. There are no good criteria other than how fast you can understand the code.
3. It’s testable
Software developers spreadly agree tat a requirement for the code to be a high-quality product is that can be tested. Good code should be testable programmatically. In another word, the code has been written in this way that automated tets have been created to make sure that each component of code does what it’s supposed to do.
The great software code is always well-tested, and usually, it is necessary to develop the product.
4. It’s easy to maintain
Not matter how well a piece of code is written, bugs will be found that will need to be changed and fixed. The difficult or ease that can be done will depend on thing likes its readability, modifiability, and simplicity. Whether the original developer or someone else will have to do the job, programmers spreadly agree that code will easy to maintain considered as a high-quality software code.
In reality, all code has to be maintained, no need to have that task made more difficult than necessary.
5. It’s pleasant to look at
While the look of source code is not related to how it performs, it can matter to developers. The use of proper formattings such as spacing, indentation or capitalization can make a program easier or more difficult to rea, hence understand. Many programmers feel that better-looking code is higher quaily code.
The first impression is always important and the code is considered as a good product if this first impression is good.
6. It’s easy to change
The functionality of an existing piece of software code will need to changed, expand or reused elsewhere in the future. A good code is considered to be tat which can be modified with a minimum amount of effort. Most of developers like code that can be changed without causing unpleasant side effects.
7. It’s simple
A piece of source code may ultimately be doing complex duty, but the best code, developer usually say, is often very simple. In other words, many things such as avoiding deeply, nested loops, big statements, or keeping methods, functions and other block of code short and highly concentrated. The best code writers will know how to get the job don with that over-complicating things.
8. It’s efficient
To some developers, the best code is the code that runs fast and uses minimal system resources. Run time efficiency is considered important for software that is meant to perform computationally intensive tasks. Faster execution times can come at the expense of code readability, a tradeoff that some developer are willing to make.